I refer to The Star's article "Astro to Increase Prices.".
If there is one brand we Malaysians are all familiar with for as long as we could remember, it would undeniably be Astro, the classic television broadcasting service we all find relatable to our daily television habits. In fact, I think it is necessary for me to rephrase; Astro is the ONLY television broadcasting service available in Malaysia. Ever faced the scenario where Astro ceased to operate due to the slightest drizzle? You curse, and you swear, and you realize that there's nothing you can do, not even subscribe to any other TV broadcasting service.
If there is one brand we Malaysians are all familiar with for as long as we could remember, it would undeniably be Astro, the classic television broadcasting service we all find relatable to our daily television habits. In fact, I think it is necessary for me to rephrase; Astro is the ONLY television broadcasting service available in Malaysia. Ever faced the scenario where Astro ceased to operate due to the slightest drizzle? You curse, and you swear, and you realize that there's nothing you can do, not even subscribe to any other TV broadcasting service.
The reason to why the citizens of Malaysia have
no choice but to put up with Astro’s incapability is because Astro is the sole
firm that dominates the Malaysian broadcasting and media industry, leaving
people no choice but to subscribe to Astro for their daily habitual
fulfillment. A sole dominating firm is better known as a Monopoly, which normally exists
in an imperfectly competitive industry, where change in price would not affect
the demand much. A monopoly tend to have legal rights in order for them to stay
in control in the industry for a long time, for example the Malaysian
authorities’ agreement to hand Astro a definite contract for 20 years, up until
the year 2017. This strategic act is infamously known as a barrier to entry,
and competing firms should expect more from Astro, such as the ownership of
satellites in Malaysia. Monopolies are normally backed by a number of politicians,
so that the business will be a profitable one for the government as well. Astro
is also a price-setter, where gullible Malaysians just sit and watch Astro
increase the subscription charge year by year. Astro can afford to increase
their price to as much as they like, even to a ridiculous amount, and yet the
demand would not change as much because the price of Astro is inelastic.
The unreliability and the recent increase in
prices of Astro might somehow affect the television and cinema industry. This
might be the case when people decide that Astro is not worth watching and that
watching movies in cinemas would be more worthy, thus harming the television
business while refining the cinema business. The contract the Malaysian
government promised Astro might also affect the perception of Malaysian voters
about the controlling government, which might also politically affect the
Malaysian government. Whether Astro stays as a monopoly or not, I do not think
it will bring about any significant effect on the Malaysian economy.
Reference: http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/6/24/business/8963931&sec=business
Reference:
No comments:
Post a Comment